569 NC applications · 6 weeks

What the new screener does with each old call

new level: Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Disqualify Unable
Old: Recommendadvance
162
113
30
40
349
Old: Not recommendreject
132
136
Old: Reviewunsure
33
15
17
77
Old recommends split into real levels — and 40 get disqualified (caught). Old rejects stay rejected (132 disqualify). The 77-strong review pile gets resolved into clear levels.
Advance count per site · old screener vs new + priorities

The result, site by site

old screener advanced new + priorities
Need 1 · highest urgency — takes Levels 1–3 121 → 134 advance
Pinehurst
23
26
Raeford
21
19
Winston-Salem
22
22
Aberdeen
13
12
Mocksville
4
8
Mount Airy
9
10
+9 smaller
29
37
Need 2 · takes Levels 1–2 136 → 126 advance
Charlotte
84
79
Durham
13
11
Kannapolis
14
14
Sanford
12
11
+4 smaller
13
11
Need 3 · pickiest — Level 1 only 92 → 44 advance
Greensboro
21
12
Wilmington
19
8
Jacksonville
13
9
Cape Fear
10
4
Newton Grove
8
1
+3 smaller
21
10
Same applicants, gate set by each site's need. Need-1 sites barely move (121→134); the tightening lands on the pickiest Need-3 sites (92→44), which take Level 1 only.
The two questions · NC · 6 weeks

The answers

Q1 · recruiter time saved
39
interviews avoided — rejected candidates who'd been interviewed for ~0 hires
≈ 5 recruiter-hrs / week
Q2 · hires lost
1
hire lost, out of 46 real hires (2%)
one Level 2 at a pickiest site
Tested against everyone who actually signed an offer: the new screen would have advanced 45 of 46. Still needs the no-show + "no open case" gates — those are separate from screening.
← → or click to navigate